ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Combating
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted detection and antimicrobial susceptibility of common pathogens of failed root canal treatments: A cross-sectional study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Time-dependent effect of nanoparticle-based intracanal medicament on root dentin microhardness and their antibacterial efficacy againstJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Persistent endodontic infections caused by Aims: To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine intracanal medicaments, with and without chitosan nanoparticle incorporation, against Setting and Design: Materials and Methods: An eighty Statistical Analysis Used: Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's Results: CNP incorporation significantly enhanced and prolonged antimicrobial activity. CHX + CNPs showed the largest inhibition zones (28.0 ± 1.9 mm vs. Conclusion: CNPs synergistically potentiate conventional medicaments via deeper diffusion, sustained release, and intrinsic antimicrobial action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.