ArticleiScience2026
Assessing the consistency of simultaneous tripling of nuclear and renewable energy capacity in Korea: Evidence from the IPCC AR6 scenarios.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At COP28, the international community, including Korea, committed to tripling renewable energy capacity by 2030 and nuclear capacity by 2050. These pledges are embedded within Korea's carbon neutrality framework and the 11th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand. This study examines the consistency of Korea's clean energy policies with Paris-compliant trajectories derived from the IPCC AR6 scenario database. Our analysis demonstrates that Korea's current electricity plan exhibits a slower phase-out of fossil fuel capacity relative to Paris-aligned pathways. Moreover, while the renewable energy tripling target demonstrates strong alignment with global decarbonization scenarios, the majority of IPCC AR6 models project constrained nuclear expansion, rendering the nuclear tripling pledge inconsistent with prevalent long-term pathways. As Korea advances its energy transformation, enhanced science-based modeling and rigorous scenario analysis are imperative to ensure policy coherence with global decarbonization objectives and support evidence-informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.