ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Hidden diagnoses among patients with double seronegative myasthenia gravis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Double seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSnMG) is defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) without detectable antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). Absence of a disease-specific biomarker and clinical heterogeneity can significantly complicate diagnostic pathway. This study aimed to identify cases misdiagnosed as dSnMG. Methodology: The study included 33 patients [64% females, median age at onset 30 (22.5-40) years, median age at testing 46 (34-58) years] previously diagnosed with dSnMG. Disease severity was assessed using MG-ADL and QMG at testing, peak MGFA, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization and MG crisis history. Indirect immunofluorescence was performed to detect low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) antibodies. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was conducted, along with genetic testing for myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2 (DM1 and DM2) and oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD). Results: Mean MG-ADL and QMG scores at testing were 1 (0-3) and 6 (3-9), respectively. More than half of the patients had ocular MG (52%). One patient experienced myasthenic crisis. One patient tested positive for LRP4 antibodies, and one was diagnosed with paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. WES showed likely pathogenic variant c.517G > A in the Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering alternative diagnoses in patients with dSnMG and emphasizes the value of comprehensive testing. Early recognition of causative etiologies can significantly improve patient management and outcome and prevent unnecessary exposure to prolonged immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.