Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940286›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2025

Comprehensive comparison of egg yolk of three Korean native chicken varieties: physicochemical quality, antioxidant activity, and flavor-related substances.

Yousung Jung, Dongwook Kim, Soomin Oh, Sangrok Lee, Hee-Jeong Lee, Hyo-Jun Choo, Aera Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yousung JungDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-2394
Dongwook KimDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-1961
Soomin OhDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2403-4813
Sangrok LeeDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6476-0127
Hee-Jeong LeeDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-482X
Hyo-Jun ChooPoultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Pyeongchang 25342, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7747-5077
Aera JangDepartment of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-8956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation of native chicken breeds is essential for promoting sustainable farming practice and preserving local genetic resources. Herein, we investigated the physicochemical quality, antioxidant activity, and flavor-related compounds of egg yolk from three Korean native chicken (KNC) breeds, namely blue-shelled egg (BSE), Woorimatdag No. 1 and 2 chicken egg (WRMD1E and WRMD2E), and commercial egg (CE). The physicochemical characteristics of chicken eggs, such as Haugh unit, yolk color, and eggshell characteristics, along with yolk traits including moisture, crude fat, pH, and cholesterol levels, were found to vary depending on the species (

Indexed as

Chicken eggEgg qualityFatty acid compositionFree amino acidGenetic diversityVolatile organic compound

Identifiers

PMID41940286
PMCPMC13047291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.