Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940284›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2014

A Comparison of Combined P-value Methods for Gene Differential Expression Using RNA-Seq Data.

Abdallah M Eteleeb, Hunter N Moseley, Eric C Rouchka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdallah M EteleebDepartment of Computer, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Hunter N MoseleyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Eric C RouchkaDepartment of Computer, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

WKU Lead Faculty AwardP20GM103436 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ERIC C ROUCHKA · 2012 to 2026
$60.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of differentially expressed (DE) genes across conditions within RNA-Seq datasets yields insight into the differences in biological processes at work in these conditions. Most methods available for discovering DE genes use statistical methods that model the data based on counting reads that map to individual genes. However, the distribution of reads across different regions of a gene can be heterogeneous. Summarizing reads at the gene level may provide inaccurate results. If genes are broken down into smaller regions, such as exons or even smaller fragments, and DE analysis is performed on those regions, the significance of the overall region can be determined using combined

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCombining P-valuesDifferential ExpressionI.1.2 [Algorithms]: Analysis of algorithmsJ.3 [Life and Medical Sciences]: Biology and geneticsRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID41940284
PMCPMC13045666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.