ArticleCurrent zoology2026
Fair game: urban free-ranging dogs balance resource use and risk aversion at seasonal fairs.
Article in Current zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Much Is Enough? An Empirical Test of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seasonal fairs, bustling with human activity, provide a unique environment for exploring the interplay between humans and free-ranging dogs in a human-dominated habitat. Across 14 fair sites in West Bengal, India, we explored how human footfall and resource availability impact dog distribution and behavior. These fairs are typically held in open grounds during the winter and spring seasons, so data collection occurred from December to March, in two phases. Three randomly selected days during the fair were used for sampling in three sessions per day. Employing spot census, scan sampling and video recording, observers documented GPS locations, sex, and instantaneous behaviors of FRDs. There was a notable increase in human flux during the middle phase of the fair on a day, while dog abundance increased during the end phase. Dogs predominantly foraged, exhibited gait, and remained vigilant, their numbers were positively associated with resource availability. Proximity of territories to the fairground significantly shaped dog behavior; dogs closer to the fair demonstrated the consistency of presence, implying efficient resource utilization. Conversely, dogs from farther distances exhibited lower consistency and a "grab-and-go" strategy, suggesting cognitive adaptations to resource scarcity and competition. These findings lend support to the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis and underscore the intricate relationship between human activity, resource availability, and the behavior and cognition of FRDs during seasonal fairs. They offer insights into the ecological dynamics of FRDs in human-dominated landscapes, emphasizing the necessity for comprehensive management strategies in urban and peri-urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.