Perceptions of the Proposed Food and Drug Administration Graphic Cigarette Warnings Among Adults Who Smoke on a Nondaily or Daily Basis: A Within-Subjects Experiment.

Bethany Shorey Fennell, Renee E Magnan, Jennifer I Vidrine, Damon J Vidrine, Linda D Cameron

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bethany Shorey FennellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.

Renee E MagnanDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, Washington.

Jennifer I VidrineDepartment of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Damon J VidrineDepartment of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Linda D CameronDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, California.

Funding

AppalTRuST Project 3: Impact of proposed tobacco product rules in Appalachia on consumption and product switching with the Experimental Tobacco MarketplaceU54DA058256 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Mikhail Nikolaas Koffarnus · 2023 to 2026

$19.2M

NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA058256

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: People who smoke nondaily represent nearly one third of U.S. adults who smoke and experience significant smoking-related morbidity and mortality, yet they are rarely considered when evaluating the efficacy of graphic cigarette warnings. Method: In October 2019, U.S. adults who smoked nondaily ( Results: Adults who smoked nondaily (versus daily) were younger ( Conclusions: The capacity of graphic warnings to elicit responses associated with motivation to quit smoking may be particularly robust for adults smoking nondaily. That graphic warnings discourage smoking is promising for this underserved group of people who smoke.

Indexed as

cigarette packaginggraphic warning labelsNondaily smokingsmokingtobacco regulation

Identifiers

PMID41940211

DOI10.1016/j.focus.2025.100474

PMCPMC13050075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.