ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Comparing gradient boosting and neural networks in the prediction of intersecting genes in gingival epithelial immunity.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel approach, exploring subgingival temperature changes over time since death: An animal study.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The gingival epithelium serves as the primary immune barrier against microbial invasion. Disruption contributes to chronic inflammation and the development of periodontitis. Understanding the gene interactions that regulate epithelial immunity is vital for effective diagnostics and treatment. Machine learning predicts key genes from differential and co-expression analyses, providing new insights into immune regulation. This study compares gradient boosting (GB) and neural network (NN) models in predicting genes involved in gingival epithelial immunity. Materials and Methods: Differential gene expression was analyzed using the iDEP web tool on the NCBI GEO dataset (GSE243173), which included samples from healthy, periodontitis, and LAD1 periodontitis subjects. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified gene modules that were correlated with specific phenotypes. Intersecting genes from differential expression and WGCNA were preprocessed and classified using GB and NN models in the Orange platform. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and AUC metrics to assess the predictive efficacy of gingival epithelial immune gene clusters. Results: The NN model outperformed GB in predicting clustered genes, accurately identifying positive and negative samples. It achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.987, a classification accuracy of 0.958, an F1 score of 0.958, a precision of 0.963, a recall of 0.958, and a specificity of 0.979. These results demonstrate the potential of NN in identifying intersecting genes involved in gingival epithelial immunity. Conclusions: The NN model's superior performance suggests its potential in genomic studies, particularly in identifying genes involved in immune responses. Further optimization and validation are necessary to fully explore its capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.