ArticleArab journal of urology2026
Double versus standard dose of tamsulosin with solifenacin for management of ureteral stent related symptoms.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ureteral stents are commonly used to ensure adequate drainage of the upper urinary tract in the presence, or anticipated occurrence, of ureteral obstruction. However, stent-related symptoms are frequent and represent a significant source of morbidity. Although several pharmacological treatment options are currently available, symptom relief remains often incomplete. In an effort to achieve better control of stent-related symptoms, we evaluated the efficacy of dose doubling in two commonly used drug combinations that have demonstrated symptomatic benefits in this context. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a double dose of solifenacin and tamsulosin compared to the standard dose of the same agents in alleviating stent-related symptoms. Patients and methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 64 Egyptian patients recruited from the outpatient clinic and inpatient services of the Urology Department at Ain Shams University Hospital over a six-month period. Results: After two weeks of treatment, the double dose of tamsulosin and solifenacin was significantly more effective in reducing stent-related symptoms compared to the standard dose. A statistically significant difference in symptom scores was observed between the double-dose and standard-dose groups. Side effects were more frequent in the double-dose group, with retrograde ejaculation and dry mouth occurring at significantly higher rates. Conclusion: The combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin is effective in alleviating stent-related symptoms. In patients who continue to experience symptoms despite standard-dose therapy, doubling the dose of both agents may offer additional symptomatic relief, albeit with a higher incidence of temporary and manageable side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.