Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940119›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2026

Double versus standard dose of tamsulosin with solifenacin for management of ureteral stent related symptoms.

Ahmad Hefnawy, Mohamed Ramadan, Hisham Arafa, Tarek Osman, Mohamed Saied

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad HefnawyUrology department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9911-6271
Mohamed RamadanUrology department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hisham ArafaUrology department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Tarek OsmanUrology department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed SaiedUrology department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ureteral stents are commonly used to ensure adequate drainage of the upper urinary tract in the presence, or anticipated occurrence, of ureteral obstruction. However, stent-related symptoms are frequent and represent a significant source of morbidity. Although several pharmacological treatment options are currently available, symptom relief remains often incomplete. In an effort to achieve better control of stent-related symptoms, we evaluated the efficacy of dose doubling in two commonly used drug combinations that have demonstrated symptomatic benefits in this context. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a double dose of solifenacin and tamsulosin compared to the standard dose of the same agents in alleviating stent-related symptoms. Patients and methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 64 Egyptian patients recruited from the outpatient clinic and inpatient services of the Urology Department at Ain Shams University Hospital over a six-month period. Results: After two weeks of treatment, the double dose of tamsulosin and solifenacin was significantly more effective in reducing stent-related symptoms compared to the standard dose. A statistically significant difference in symptom scores was observed between the double-dose and standard-dose groups. Side effects were more frequent in the double-dose group, with retrograde ejaculation and dry mouth occurring at significantly higher rates. Conclusion: The combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin is effective in alleviating stent-related symptoms. In patients who continue to experience symptoms despite standard-dose therapy, doubling the dose of both agents may offer additional symptomatic relief, albeit with a higher incidence of temporary and manageable side effects.

Indexed as

solifenacinstent-related symptomsTamsulosin

Identifiers

PMID41940119
PMCPMC13045170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.