ArticleClinical optometry2026
Comfort and Ocular Surface Impact of Verofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in Satisfied Senofilcon A Daily Disposable Lens Wearers: A Prospective Non-Interventional Study.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate quality of life, comfort, and vision in long-term satisfied wearers of Senofilcon A daily disposable contact lens (SA) contact lenses after switching to Verofilcon A daily disposable contact lenses (VA), and to assess ocular surface parameters using an objective diagnostic platform C.DIAG (Quantel Medical, a brand of Lumibird, Clermont-Ferrand, France), a multimodal imaging platform for tear film assessment. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, non-interventional study including 30 participants aged 20-40 years, all satisfied SA wearers. After 14 ± 2 days of vA wear, participants completed the CLDEQ-8 questionnaire and rated comfort and vision using a visual analog scale (VAS). Objective ocular surface assessments were performed using C.diag, including non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), interferometry, blink analysis, and tear meniscus height. Statistical analysis was performed using paired Student's t-tests to compare subjective outcomes before and after the lens switch. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: The mean CLDEQ-8 score with va was 6.33 ± 2.82, with 56.7% of participants categorised as "excellent." VAS scores for vision and comfort with va were 87.3 ± 9.4 and 86.6 ± 10.8, respectively. No statistically significant deterioration in tear film parameters was observed after switching lenses (p > 0.05). NIBUT measurements were 11.5 ± 4.4 seconds (od) and 11.8 ± 4.3 seconds (os), with stable interferometry scores and consistent tear meniscus height observed. Conclusion: VA daily disposable contact lenses provided high levels of subjective comfort and stable objective ocular surface parameters in previously satisfied daily disposable lens wearers. The C.DIAG device enabled standardized and non-invasive tear film analysis during contact lens wear. Further randomized and long-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.