Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940065›Full record

ReviewNorthern clinics of Istanbul2026

A comprehensive review of de novo oligometastatic breast cancer: Current treatment options, surgical outcomes, and systemic therapy.

Bulent Citgez, Banu Yigit, Emir Capkinoglu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bulent CitgezDepartment of General Surgery, Halic University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Banu YigitDepartment of General Surgery, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Emir CapkinogluDepartment of General Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a biologically diverse malignancy, manifesting with variable clinical trajectories. While systemic therapy (ST) constitutes the primary modality in its treatment paradigm, the role of locoregional interventions such as surgery and radiotherapy is increasingly being explored, particularly in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. This subset, defined by a limited number of metastatic sites, may follow a less aggressive course and thus become candidates for intensified multimodal therapeutic strategies. Although locoregional treatment (LRT) alone does not offer a curative outcome in the metastatic setting, it can provide meaningful benefits in terms of local disease control, palliation of symptoms, and overall improvement in quality of life. The survival benefit associated with surgical removal of the primary tumor in dnMBC remains a subject of ongoing investigation, with current evidence yielding inconclusive results regarding its effect on overall survival. Nevertheless, a range of individual parameters including the biological characteristics of the tumor, the extent of metastatic spread, response to ST, and the patient's overall functional status play a decisive role in guiding therapeutic choices. Employing a multidisciplinary framework is crucial to appropriately select patients who are most likely to benefit from the addition of LRT as part of an integrated treatment approach.

Indexed as

Locoregional therapyoligometastasisradiotherapysurgerysystemic therapytumor burden

Identifiers

PMID41940065
PMCPMC13047271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.