Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41940051›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2026

Vaccine spending and economic recovery: OECD panel data analysis.

Engin Aydın, Mustafa Ozyesil, Havane Tembelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Engin AydınIstanbul Provincial Health Directorate, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Mustafa OzyesilDepartment of Business Administration, Halic University Faculty of Business, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Havane TembeloIstanbul Provincial Health Directorate, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigates whether public spending on vaccination programmes contributes to macroeconomic normalization following severe health shocks in high-income Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies.

methodsAn unbalanced OECD panel dataset was analysed using a fixed-effects specification that incorporates structural controls including inflation, unemployment, trade openness, and general health expenditure.

resultsThe empirical results indicate that vaccine expenditure does not exert a statistically significant independent effect on economic recovery, although the coefficients display a positive but economically modest direction. Conversely, several macroeconomic fundamentals demonstrate stronger and more consistent associations with recovery dynamics.

conclusionVaccination functions as a necessary but insufficient component of recovery strategies, with its economic influence mediated through system-level efficiency rather than direct fiscal input. Integrated policy frameworks that combine public health interventions with structural economic measures are required.

Indexed as

Economic recoveryOECD countriespanel data analysispublic health investmentvaccine expenditure

Identifiers

PMID41940051
PMCPMC13047268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.