ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Functional and Phylogenetic Implications of Canopy Mesophication in Temperate Hardwood Forests.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest mesophication describes the shifting of plant communities from fire-adapted, drought tolerant systems to those dominated by species better adapted to shaded, closed-canopy environments. While commonly characterized from a taxonomic perspective, the phylogenetic underpinnings and functional attributes of forest mesophication have received less quantitative testing. To address this, we applied phylogenetic and functional trait data to legacy datasets of changing forest composition in Wisconsin, USA from the latter half of the 20th century. In both the 1950s and 2000s, forests demonstrated a phylogenetically clustered structure, with closely related species occupying similar sites. The inclusion of functional traits into mixed models accounted for 40.8% of the variance explained by this clustering in the 1950s and just 19.6% in the 2000s. This diminished explanatory value of functional traits corresponds with significant functional and phylogenetic turnover, with the majority of sites demonstrating substantial temporal functional beta diversity. Contemporary trait syndromes were defined by broad declines in drought tolerance, fire tolerance, and litter flammability, as well as an increase in leaf traits associated with acquisitive resource strategies. Such shifts identify the diminished capacity of traits to explain phylogenetic clustering, but species-level trends and landscape-level functional trajectories also give stewards explicit targets to meet land management goals. While future studies on the influence of intraspecific trait variation and trait-environment relationships would further clarify functional shifts in temperate deciduous forests, our findings provide quantifiable support for the hypothesized functional implications of mesophication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.