ArticleMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2026
Transient Cortical Blindness and Hemi-Spatial Neglect Following Watchman Device Implantation.
Article in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 66-year-old male with prior right middle cerebral artery stroke status post thrombectomy-as well as right internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting and chronic occlusion, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and hypertension-underwent left atrial appendage occlusion with a Watchman device for stroke prevention. Immediately following the procedure, he developed acute bilateral vision loss accompanied by headache and worsening left-sided weakness. Emergent computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography demonstrated no hemorrhagic stroke or new large-vessel occlusion and confirmed the previously known chronic right ICA occlusion. The patient was not a candidate for thrombolysis due to recent heparin exposure during his procedure, and thrombectomy was not pursued given the absence of any new large vessel occlusion. In the context of contrast exposure and negative initial imaging, contrast-induced cortical blindness was considered the leading diagnosis, with embolism, hypoperfusion, and post-stroke recrudescence as alternative considerations. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity of acute cortical blindness and hemispatial neglect following Watchman implantation. Mechanisms may include microembolic shower, transient hypoperfusion, seizure-related cortical dysfunction, post-stroke recrudescence, or contrast induced cortical blindness. Negative initial CT imaging should not preclude suspicion for ischemia, especially in patients with preexisting cerebrovascular compromise. Early magnetic resonance imaging and multidisciplinary coordination are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.