ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Optimizing COPD Care in Belgium: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Risk Management.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategies for therapeutic optimization and proactive care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an Italian expert opinion.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a major health and economic challenge in Belgium, affecting approximately 800,000 individuals, half of whom remain undiagnosed. Beyond respiratory morbidity, COPD patients face substantial cardiopulmonary (CP) risk-encompassing severe exacerbations and cardiovascular (CV) events-that is often under-recognized and insufficiently addressed due to limited clinical awareness, fragmented care, and the absence of national guidance. Methods: A multidisciplinary Belgian taskforce (general practitioners, pulmonologists, cardiologists, pharmacists, epidemiologists) convened through structured workshops and iterative consensus-building to develop a pragmatic, evidence-informed care pathway. The recommendations focus on COPD patients with at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, who are at heightened CP risk. Results: This consensus introduces an integrated, stepwise framework that positions CP risk as a central component of COPD management after exacerbation and operationalizes it across primary care, hospitalization, and post-exacerbation follow-up. Core elements include systematic and proactive CP risk identification in primary care, standardized diagnostic workups during hospitalization, and multidisciplinary discharge planning. Pharmacological strategies combine eosinophil-guided inhaler therapy with guideline-directed CV treatment, while non-pharmacological measures reinforce smoking cessation, vaccination, physical activity, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Clear referral thresholds between primary care, pulmonology, and cardiology are defined, supported by patient education and digital monitoring tools. Conclusion: This Belgian consensus complements international guidelines by consolidating fragmented recommendations into coherent, actionable algorithms that bridge gaps in routine practice. Its contribution lies in translating emerging evidence into structured, real-world pathways that integrate respiratory and cardiac care. Adoption of this framework may help reduce exacerbations, improve CV outcomes, and support multidisciplinary COPD care in Belgium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.