SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Islet function impairment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Rise of Oncoendocrinology: How Modern Cancer Therapies Are Reshaping Endocrine Practice.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) are associated with islet function impairment (IFI), manifesting as hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Delayed detection and management may lead to irreversible β-cell damage and life-threatening complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of IFI associated with ICPis. Methods: Following PICOS principles, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP databases from inception to October 24, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICPis versus non-ICPis regimens in cancer patients. Outcomes included hyperglycemia, DM, and DKA. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models. Quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and publication bias was evaluated by Begg's test. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025639629). Results: A total of 31 RCT studies with 15,417 patients were included in this study. Results showed that ICPis treatment significantly increased the risk of associated IFI (RR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.10-1.53, Conclusions: ICPis significantly increase the risk of IFI, particularly T1DM and severe (grade 3-5) events. PD-1 inhibitors and patients with NSCLC represent high-risk subgroups. We strongly recommend multidisciplinary monitoring and proactive blood glucose management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/myprospero, identifier CRD42025639629.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.