ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Decoding macrophage heterogeneity in the pulmonary fibrosis lung cancer transition.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue-Resident Macrophage in Inflammation and Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and hotspots regarding macrophage polarization in lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Macrophages in lung cancer: principal factors, regulatory mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) significantly increases the risk of lung cancer (LC), but the mechanisms underlying this transition remain unclear. This overview positions macrophage heterogeneity as a central node within the PF-LC continuum. First, we describe important subpopulations of profibrotic and pro-tumor macrophages, including SPP1+, MERTK+, TREM2+, and MARCO+ cells, using high-resolution spatial and single-cell omics technologies. Next, we analyze the fundamental mechanisms that determine their function: the fibrotic microenvironment (e.g., extracellular matrix stiffness, hypoxia) induces profound metabolic reprogramming (e.g., Warburg effect, lipid peroxidation) and stabilizes epigenetic memory (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications), locking them into a pathogenic state. This reprogramming occurs through two main pathways: (1) metabolic reprogramming, characterized by aerobic glycolytic conversion and dysregulated lipid metabolism, which stimulates both pathogenic functions and suppression of T cell activity; (2) Epigenetic modifications, including stabilized alterations in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and superactivator patterns, which maintain cells in a tumor-promoting phenotype. As central nodes of communication, these macrophages interact pathologically with fibroblasts and epithelial cells through secreted factors and extracellular vesicles, forming self-reinforcing feedback loops that promote disease progression. We are studying the crucial role of new technologies, particularly multi-omic spatial models and high-precision organoids, in fostering mechanistic discoveries. These discoveries pave the way for new macrophage-focused therapeutic strategies, including the precise stratification of patients using biomarkers from liquid biopsies (such as soluble SPP1 and MARCO) and the development of targeted drug delivery systems for the selective modulation of macrophage function, thus establishing a new paradigm for therapeutic interventions in pulmonary fibrosis with concomitant lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.