ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Development and validation of a diagnostic nomogram integrating anatomical scores and systemic immune-inflammatory biomarkers for
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At initial diagnosis, approximately 30% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients have Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in accordance with the TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) reporting guideline, involving patients with RCC treated at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2016 to August 2025. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Variable selection was performed using three machine learning algorithms: LASSO, SVM-RFE, and Boruta. Independent predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression, and a diagnostic nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Three independent predictors were identified: lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98), serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) (OR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.36), and PADUA (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical) score (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.771 in the training cohort and 0.747 in the validation cohort. Calibration curves demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and actual probabilities, while decision curve analysis highlighted the nomogram's net clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: The developed nomogram demonstrated moderate discriminatory ability and high clinical applicability in identifying cancer metastasis in patients with initially diagnosed RCC. However, further validation with larger sample sizes and multicenter external cohorts is essential to confirm its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.