ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology
A one-and-a-half repair in a pulmonary atresia intact ventricular septum: A more appropriate final repair strategy.
Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PAIVS) may be unable to compensate for right heart failure in the remote period due to inadequate right ventricular function, even if both ventricular circulations are maintained in the short term. One-and-a-half repairs may have a lower risk of remote right heart failure and severe complications than biventricular repair (BVR). We compared complications and hemodynamics during the medium term for each type of circulatory repair, estimated the risk of right heart failure, and discussed the PAIVS strategy, considering the remote prognosis. Materials and Methods: Of 105 PAIVS patients who underwent surgical intervention at our hospital, we excluded patients who died ( Results: The mean age (range) at the last evaluation was as follows: BVR, 17.5 (2-39) years; one-and-a-half, 28.5 (6-34) years; and Fontan, 14 (3-36) years. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification was lowest in the one-and-a-half group (P = 0.06) (NYHA I/II/III: BVR, 11/5/0; one-and-a-half, 6/0/0; Fontan, 65/7/0). The central venous pressure was the lowest in the one-and-a-half group: one-and-a-half, 4 (1-14) mmHg; BVR, 4.5 (1-10) mmHg; and Fontan, 8 [5-15] mmHg. Conclusions: A one-and-a-half repair is a final repair because it offers a safer hemodynamic margin and may also carry a lower risk of long-term right ventricle failure than BVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.