ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development trajectory of postural control in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a differential analysis of psycho-social adjustment.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the trajectory of postural control and its influencing factors in stroke patients with hemiplegia, and to explore the correlation between different trajectories and psycho-social adjustment. Methods: A cohort of 225 stroke patients with hemiplegia was assessed using the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) and the Self-Report Psycho-social Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS-SR) at five time points from discharge to 6 months post-discharge (T1-T5), with data analyzed via latent class growth modeling, factor analysis, and ANOVA. Results: Three postural control trajectories were identified: C1 significant improvement group, C2 slow improvement group, and C3 no improvement group. There were significant differences in age ( Conclusion: For stroke patients with hemiplegia, an individualized rehabilitation program should be implemented, along with early intervention of postural control training and combined with psychosocial support intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.