ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Point-of-care-ultrasound in cardiac arrest: a useful tool for resuscitation.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest is defined as the sudden loss of heart activity, resulting in ineffective breathing and blood circulation. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) provides real-time, evidence-based information during resuscitation and enables rapid identification of reversible conditions to guide ongoing resuscitative efforts. This mini-review focuses on the utility of POCUS during cardiac arrest, including its role in non-shockable rhythms such as pulseless electrical activity, pseudo-PEA, and asystole, where electrocardiographic findings alone may be misleading. POCUS can assist in the identification of reversible causes, including cardiac tamponade, massive pulmonary embolism, and tension pneumothorax. The review also addresses the role of serial ultrasound in monitoring cardiac activity and guiding advanced resuscitation, while emphasizing that ultrasound should not be used as the sole criterion for termination of resuscitation. We have also reviewed the practical aspects of performing POCUS during cardiac arrest, including probe selection, obtaining useful views, and strategies to minimize interruptions to chest compressions. Structured approaches such as the Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Assessment protocol are discussed to support efficient image acquisition within the 10-s pulse-check window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.