Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Traditional wisdom through scientific evidence: a review of

Sruthi Chenganakattil, Soumya Mohan, Shyam Vinayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sruthi ChenganakattilDepartment of Shalya Tantra, Amrita School of Ayurveda, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Soumya MohanDepartment of Shalya Tantra, Amrita School of Ayurveda, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Shyam VinayanDepartment of Shalya Tantra, Amrita School of Ayurveda, Kollam, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder dislocations represent 50 percent of all major joint dislocations, with anterior dislocation being most common accounting for up to 97% of all shoulder dislocations. The shoulder is inherently unstable because the shallow glenoid fossa articulates with only a small portion of the humeral head. Various techniques are available for reduction, with Kocher's being widely practiced. However, both the Kocher and Hippocratic techniques are linked to complications like axillary nerve injury and humeral fractures. Traditional Methodology: The relevant papers regarding shoulder joint dislocation were reviewed from scholarly articles.The concept of Results: The Discussion: The various methods for addressing anterior shoulder joint dislocation should be carefully considered. Conclusion: It is reported to be relatively atraumatic and painless, with a success rate comparable to more established methods.

Indexed as

Amsa sandhimokśaAyurvedaMarma manipulationMilch methodshoulder dislocation

Identifiers

PMID41939762
PMCPMC13047895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.