ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Faculty perspectives on factors influencing the passing of underperforming health profession students: challenging the 'success-only' culture.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In health professions, assessment plays an essential role in ensuring patient safety, professional competency and academic integrity. Nevertheless, in a variety of educational settings, the phenomenon of "failure to fail," in which underperforming students are allowed to advance, has been documented. There is little data from Pakistan on how faculty members deal with this difficulty, especially in summative clinical and didactic evaluations. The purpose of this study was to investigate faculty perceptions of the variables affecting underperforming undergraduate students' advancement in Pakistani health professions (medical, dental & allied). Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed using a semi-structured, anonymous Google form. The survey was distributed through professional faculty Whatsapp groups. Participation was voluntary and only faculty members actively involved in undergraduate assessments were eligible. Purposive sampling yielded 33 completed responses. Results: The majority of faculty (84.8%) stated that students who performed poorly were nevertheless able to pass. Institutional uncertainty (39.4%), social pressure (27.3%), and pity (12.1%) were among the major factors that contributed. Even though 78.8% had previous experience with failing students, the majority of their decision was based on academic underperformance (72.7%), considering the attitudes of faculty regarding failing students, one-third of participants acknowledged it to be a emotional turmoil, however the majority rejected the fact that failing a student was a reflection of their own teaching. There was little knowledge of institutional support systems (42.4%) and many respondents were either impartial or ignorant of the impact of organisational policies. Discussion: Despite faculty concerns, the majority of participants reported seeing instances where students with subpar or questionable performance advanced to later academic years. Commonly cited factors included uncertainty regarding institutional policies, limited remediation pathways, and emotional and ethical challenges associated with failing students. Qualitative analysis identified themes related to emotional burden, moral dilemmas, perceived institutional pressure, and patient safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.