Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

High-carbon bio-organic fertilizer reshapes soil carbon fractions and aggregate structure while maintaining high carbon stocks in red soil.

Xiangtong Shen, Yalong Kang, Yongcheng Wang, Jiangfei Gao, Xun Li, Fengchao Liu, Qiong Li, Yuquan Wei, Hongguang Cai, Yuyun Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiangtong Shen *International Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Yalong Kang *International Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Yongcheng WangInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Jiangfei GaoInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Xun LiInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Fengchao LiuInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Qiong LiInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Yuquan WeiCollege of Resources and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hongguang CaiInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Science, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China.
Yuyun WangInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Zhi XuInternational Joint Laboratory for Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Yunnan Province, College of Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The application of bio-organic fertilizers is key to enhancing soil carbon storage, but their carbon inputs often fall short of microbial demands, limiting their long-term impact. High-carbon bio-organic fertilizers, which contain more than 40% organic matter, are used to improve soil fertility, but their effects on soil aggregate stability, organic carbon fractions, and bacterial communities, and the consequent impacts on soil carbon storage, are not well understood. Methods: This study employed a field experiment with four treatments: chemical fertilizer alone (control, CK), organic fertilizer (OF), bio-organic fertilizer (BOF), and high-carbon bio-organic fertilizer (HBOF). Results: The results showed that organic fertilizer treatments significantly increased organic carbon content across all aggregate size classes, promoted the formation of large aggregates, and improved aggregate stability compared with the CK treatment. The HBOF treatment increased the proportion of soil aggregates larger than 2 mm by 8.58% and 6.87% compared with the OF and BOF treatments, respectively. All organic fertilizers boosted soil carbon storage and active carbon fractions, particularly particulate organic carbon (POC). Under HBOF, POC and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in active carbon fractions increased by 15.83% and 24.05%, respectively, compared to BOF. The HBOF treatment reduced bacterial diversity but markedly altered community composition, enriching genera such as Conclusion: Overall, HBOF appears to promote a microbially mediated redistribution of SOC and physical protection of newly added labile carbon within macroaggregates, leading to short-term increases in SOC and improved soil structure in red soils. These findings provide a basis for optimizing organic fertilization and carbon management in medium- and low-yield croplands.

Indexed as

carbon storagehigh-carbon bio-organic fertilizermicrobial communitiessoil aggregatesoil organic carbon fractions

Identifiers

PMID41939712
PMCPMC13047207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.