Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939686›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Perinatal Depression Among Obstetric Healthcare Professionals at a Tertiary Care Center in Mumbai, India.

Karubaki Utkalika, Himangi S Warke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karubaki UtkalikaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas (GS) Medical College and King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Himangi S WarkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas (GS) Medical College and King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Perinatal depression is a common mental health condition with substantial adverse consequences for maternal well-being and child development. In India, obstetric healthcare professionals are often the first and most consistent point of contact for women during the antenatal and postpartum periods. This places them in a pivotal position to identify and facilitate early intervention for perinatal depression. However, evidence regarding their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to perinatal mental health remains limited. Aim The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to perinatal depression among obstetric healthcare professionals in a tertiary care setting in Mumbai and to identify perceived barriers to routine screening and management. Methods A five-month cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai. Obstetric healthcare professionals, including interns, junior residents, senior residents, and consultants, were recruited using purposive sampling. A structured, self-administered, validated questionnaire assessed professional characteristics and knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to perinatal depression. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and responses in the knowledge, attitude, and practice domains. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Associations between categorical variables (e.g., professional designation, prior mental health training, and screening practices) were analyzed using the Chi-squared test of independence. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 92 obstetric healthcare professionals participated. While 72 (78.3%) were aware of perinatal depression as a condition affecting women during pregnancy and the postpartum period, only 39 (42.4%) reported awareness of validated screening tools. Although attitudes toward perinatal mental health were largely positive, only 25 (27.2%) reported routinely screening women. Commonly identified barriers included lack of formal training, time constraints in busy clinical settings, limited access to mental health services, and unclear referral pathways. A significant knowledge-practice gap was observed, with higher screening practices among senior clinicians and those with prior mental health training (p < 0.001). Conclusion Despite adequate knowledge and favorable attitudes, routine screening for perinatal depression remains suboptimal. Targeted training, integration of standardized screening tools into routine obstetric care, and strengthened referral pathways are essential to improve early identification and management of perinatal depression.

Indexed as

attitudes and practicesknowledgematernal mental healthobstetric healthcare professionalsscreening

Identifiers

PMID41939686
PMCPMC13047345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.