Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939677›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Persistent Gap in Mass Drug Administration Uptake Among Known Microfilaria-Positive Individuals in India's Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program: A Call for Strengthened Follow-Up Strategies.

Ezhilarasan Selvaraju

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ezhilarasan SelvarajuCommunity Medicine, Bhaarath Medical College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research (BIHER), Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India's lymphatic filariasis elimination program has achieved high mass drug administration (MDA) coverage and substantial reductions in transmission across endemic districts. As the program transitions toward transmission assessment surveys (TAS) and post-MDA surveillance, the strategic focus is shifting from expanding coverage to sustaining verified interruption of transmission. However, reliance solely on aggregate coverage metrics may overlook an important endgame vulnerability: incomplete longitudinal follow-up of individuals identified as microfilaria (Mf) positive or filarial test strip (FTS) positive during surveillance activities. Although defined epidemiologic thresholds (microfilaremia <1% or antigenemia <2% in young children) guide decisions to stop MDA, achieving these benchmarks does not necessarily ensure that all previously identified infected individuals have cleared infection. In low-prevalence settings, even small numbers of untreated or inadequately treated individuals may sustain localized transmission. Strengthening case-based registries, treatment verification mechanisms, and structured follow-up of confirmed positives can enhance epidemiologic confidence in validated elimination and reduce the risk of recrudescence.

Indexed as

disease eradicationhealth policylymphatic filariasismass drug administrationmicrofilarianeglected tropical diseasesprogram evaluationpublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID41939677
PMCPMC13045640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.