Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939659›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Exploring Knowledge, Availability, Accessibility, and Utilization of Emergency Contraception in Ghana: A Scoping Review.

Ofeibea Asare, Sandra C Osuagwu, Anvita Dixit, Angel M Foster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ofeibea AsareFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN.
Sandra C OsuagwuFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN.
Anvita DixitFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN.
Angel M FosterFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Ghana, emergency contraception (EC) was initially introduced in the form of combined oral contraceptive pills and has since expanded to include progestin-only formulations and other methods. Despite these advances, unintended pregnancy rates remain high, suggesting limited use of post-coital contraceptive methods. We undertook this scoping review to understand what is known about EC in Ghana, with a focus on knowledge, availability and accessibility, and utilization. We used an established framework to identify, chart, and summarize relevant source materials. We identified 57 source materials for inclusion in our review. We found that most EC research focuses on specific sub-populations, including students, urban dwellers, and unmarried women. Knowledge of EC varies but is almost exclusively centered on progestin-only emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs), and information appears to be sourced from both formal and peer-based channels. While progestin-only ECPs are available, geographic barriers to access persist. Some Ghanaians use progestin-only ECPs as their only ongoing method of pregnancy prevention, while others use them alongside traditional and modern methods. Although several EC modalities are available in Ghana, knowledge and use are almost exclusively related to progestin-only ECPs. Most studies have been conducted with students, urban populations, and unmarried women. Research documenting women's lived experiences with seeking and obtaining all modalities of EC, identifying ways to increase awareness about a range of methods, and understanding the experiences of those who use progestin-only ECPs as their primary pregnancy prevention strategy appears warranted.

Indexed as

africacontraceptionemergency contraceptionghanascoping review

Identifiers

PMID41939659
PMCPMC13046390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.