Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939642›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Routine Orogastric Tube Placement Reveals an Unexpected Diagnosis Resulting in a Change in Therapy: A Case Report.

Nitin Wadhwa, Arundati Iyer, Sabina Khan, Meera Gangadharan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nitin WadhwaAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine/Pediatric Anesthesiology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital/UT Health, Houston, USA.
Arundati IyerBiological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Sabina KhanAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital/UT Health, Houston, USA.
Meera GangadharanAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine/Pediatric Anesthesiology, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital/UT Health, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the case of a pediatric patient scheduled for a magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) requiring oral contrast, and in whom an orogastric tube (OGT) was placed after the induction of anesthesia. Unexpectedly, OGT placement required three attempts, although the final placement was smooth. This prompted the anesthesiologist to order a chest radiograph, which was suspicious for an esophageal perforation. Further investigation with an esophagram revealed a previously undiagnosed paraesophageal hernia and an intrathoracic stomach and ruled out an esophageal perforation. A reduced dose of contrast was administered to decrease the chances of aspiration because of the intrathoracic position of the gastro-esophageal junction, which results in an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter. The procedure was completed uneventfully. This case highlights the importance of confirming the OGT location before use. The case also underscores the need for anesthesiologists to perform a complete evaluation if OGT placement presents unusual challenges.

Indexed as

inflammatory bowel diseasemagnetic resonance enterographyorogastric tube misplacementparaesophageal herniapediatric anesthesiology

Identifiers

PMID41939642
PMCPMC13046398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.