ArticleCureus2026
Successful Management of Early Failure (One Month) of a Standard Maxillary First Molar Implant After Sinus Lifting Using a Short Implant: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of short implants (5 mm diameter × 6 mm length) has increased in recent years, and they have mostly been indicated in the posterior maxillary areas in cases of insufficient bone height, as an alternative to sinus lift procedures. Short implants have rarely been proposed in cases of early failure (less than one month) of maxillary first molar standard implants placed after sinus lifting. We are reporting a 64-year-old female smoker who was referred for consultation concerning the extraction and implantation of tooth #16. The periodontal preparation and smoking cessation were followed by a sinus lifting. After a 10-month post-graft period, a standard implant (4.7 × 11.5 mm; Zimmer Biomet®, Warsaw, IN, USA) was placed. One month postoperatively, early failure occurred due to failure in osseointegration, and the implant was removed; three months later, a short implant (5 mm diameter × 6 mm length) was placed. The second stage of surgery was carried out at six months postoperatively. After four weeks, a crown was set. The control at 13 months showed a bone-integrated implant without lateral bone loss. The main risk factors associated with implant failure are low bone density, sinus grafting, and chronic smoking. In this case report, the association of these three risk factors led to standard implant failure. A short implant was proposed in order to avoid a new bone graft. A 2:1 crown-to-implant ratio has no impact on marginal bone loss or implant survival. In conclusion, the short implant (5 mm diameter × 6 mm length) may be a minimally invasive alternative in cases of early loss (less than one month) of a standard implant placed after sinus lifting without any additional bone grafting procedure. This data must be confirmed with a cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.