Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939616›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Near-Comparable Frequency of rob(21;21) and rob(14;21) Translocations in Trisomy 21: A Retrospective Cytogenetic Analysis of 9,313 Cases From an Indian Referral Cohort.

Suryaprakash Kunda, Mukkanteswararao Kasaragadda, Sambasivarao Patibandla, Shalini Singh, Sidrah Parvez, Tirupathi Rao Golla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suryaprakash KundaGenetics, American Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Sciences Private Limited (AMPATH) Labs, Hyderabad, IND.
Mukkanteswararao KasaragaddaGenetics, American Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Sciences Private Limited (AMPATH) Labs, Hyderabad, IND.
Sambasivarao PatibandlaGenetics, American Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Sciences Private Limited (AMPATH) Labs, Hyderabad, IND.
Shalini SinghGenetics, American Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Sciences Private Limited (AMPATH) Labs, Hyderabad, IND.
Sidrah ParvezBiotechnology, Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, IND.
Tirupathi Rao GollaConservation Genetics Lab, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Chromosomal abnormalities are one of the leading causes of developmental delay, congenital anomalies, and reproductive failure. Cytogenetic evaluation aids diagnosis, genetic counselling, and prevention. This study evaluated the cytogenetic and demographic profile of chromosomal abnormalities, with a focus on Down syndrome (DS, trisomy 21), in a large referral cohort. Methodology A retrospective analysis of 9,313 blood samples was performed using GTG-banding karyotyping. Clinical indications, age, sex, and diagnostic yield were evaluated to identify frequency patterns and etiological trends. Results Among 9,313 samples analyzed, 1,597 (17.1%) were diagnosed with DS. A male predominance was observed, with 968 (60.6%) males and 629 (39.4%) females. Classical free trisomy 21 (47,XX,+21/47,XY,+21) comprised 1,465 (91.7%) cases, while Robertsonian translocations accounted for 90 (5.6%). Other forms, including mosaicism and double aneuploidy, constituted 42 (2.6%). Among Robertsonian cases, rob(14;21) and rob(21;21) were the most frequent subtypes. In most cases, 933 (58%) were diagnosed within the first six months of life. Referral indications included clinical suspicion of trisomy 21 in 605 (38%) cases, unassigned clinical history in 460 (29%) cases, prenatal screening in 220 (14%) cases, anatomical anomalies in 75 (5%) cases, abnormal antenatal ultrasound findings in 86 (5%) cases, disorders of sex development in 16 (1%) cases, and other indications in 135 (8%) cases. Conclusions DS remains the most common autosomal aneuploidy, primarily resulting from meiotic nondisjunction. The observed male predominance and increasing referrals based on prenatal screening highlight the continued importance of cytogenetic evaluation in clinical practice. Integration of cytogenetic findings with clinical assessment is essential for accurate diagnosis, genetic counselling, and informed reproductive decision-making. The identification of Robertsonian translocations in this cohort reinforces the need for parental karyotyping to determine whether the rearrangement is inherited or de novo. In our practice, parental karyotyping is recommended in all cases of trisomy 21 to distinguish classical (free) trisomy from translocation-associated trisomy 21, thereby enabling accurate recurrence risk assessment in future pregnancies.

Indexed as

abnormal karyotypeschromosomal abnormalitydown syndromegenderreproductive failure

Identifiers

PMID41939616
PMCPMC13045641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.