Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939589›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Feasibility of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise as a Workplace-Based Assessment Tool for Respiratory Medicine Interns: A Prospective Interventional Study.

Parikh K Hymn, Minal Patel, Zainab Laxmidhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parikh K HymnDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shantabaa Medical College & General Hospital, Amreli, IND.
Minal PatelDepartment of Physiology, Pramukhswami Medical College - Bhaikaka University, Anand, IND.
Zainab LaxmidharDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shantabaa Medical College & General Hospital, Amreli, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background India bears a high burden of chronic respiratory diseases, making it imperative for medical interns to acquire strong clinical reasoning, examination, and diagnostic skills in respiratory medicine. Traditional assessment methods often fail to evaluate real-time clinical performance and provide structured feedback. Workplace-based assessment tools such as the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX), recommended under Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), offer an opportunity to assess clinical competence through direct observation. However, evidence regarding its focused application in respiratory medicine during internship is limited. Aim To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for assessing clinical competence in common respiratory diseases among medical interns. Methodology A prospective educational interventional study was conducted among 20 medical interns posted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at a tertiary care hospital. Each intern underwent two Mini-CEX encounters during a one-week posting. Clinical performance was assessed across five domains using the standard Mini-CEX tool. Intern and faculty perceptions were recorded using validated 5-point Likert scale feedback forms. Knowledge gain was assessed using pre- and post-tests. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Internal consistency of the tool was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results There was a statistically significant improvement across five Mini-CEX domains between Encounter-1 and Encounter-2 (p < 0.001). Mean overall competence scores increased from 28.50 ± 3.1 to 35.65 ± 2.5. Knowledge scores showed a significant improvement with a mean gain of 7.15 points (p < 0.0001; Cohen's d ≈ 3.71). The mean time required per Mini-CEX session was 12.6 ± 3.14 minutes, with a 100% completion rate and no reported practical difficulties. Interns and faculty reported high levels of satisfaction and acceptability. The assessment tool demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Conclusion Mini-CEX is a feasible, reliable, and effective formative assessment tool for evaluating and improving clinical competence in respiratory medicine among medical interns. Its integration into internship training aligns well with CBME principles and enhances both clinical performance and knowledge acquisition through structured observation and feedback.

Indexed as

foramative assessmentmedical educationmedical internsmini-cexrespiratory diseasesworkplace based assessment method

Identifiers

PMID41939589
PMCPMC13049460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.