ArticleCureus2026
Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage in Liver Failure: A Case-Based Approach to Transplant Candidacy and Care.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute or chronic liver disease is a life-threatening complication with repercussions on both liver transplantation candidacy and perioperative transplant management. This case series and review of the literature details the perioperative management and outcomes of three patients who experienced spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage and subsequently underwent liver transplantation. These cases highlight the challenges encountered in such complex scenarios, emphasizing the critical need for individualized assessments, tailored management strategies, and a multidisciplinary approach to maximize patient outcomes. Moreover, these cases underscore how evolving neurocritical care practice, advances in hemostatic therapies, and improved coordination between transplant and neurology teams can expand access to transplantation. Collectively, these observations contribute to a growing evidence base, supporting nuanced decision-making in situations traditionally considered prohibitive for transplant surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.