Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939550›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Determinants of Smoking Initiation Among Undergraduate Medical Students in Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Garima Suryavanshi, Neha Rai, Nandini Goyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Garima SuryavanshiDepartment of Physiology, LN Medical College and Research Center, Bhopal, IND.
Neha RaiDepartment of Anatomy, LN Medical College and Research Center, Bhopal, IND.
Nandini GoyalDepartment of General Medicine, LN Medical College and Research Center, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco use continues to pose a major health challenge in India, and undergraduate medical students form a particularly important group because of their future role in patient care and health promotion. Understanding what influences their smoking habits is crucial for guiding preventive strategies. This study explored the key factors linked to smoking behaviour among undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based observational study was designed to find determinants of smoking in undergraduate medical students from various colleges in central India. Participation was voluntary, and responses were collected anonymously after obtaining consent.

resultsA total of 489 students responded to the survey. Most participants were male and in their early 20s. Smoking was more common among young male undergraduate students in the age group of 20-22 years. Emotional distress, curiosity, peer interactions, and academic pressure were among the most frequently reported reasons for initiating or continuing smoking. The result showed that family and medical support were significantly related to quitting smoking among undergraduate medical students.

conclusionSmoking behaviour among undergraduate medical students appears to be shaped by both demographic characteristics and psychosocial influences. While no single factor independently predicted smoking, family and medical support may be the key factors in helping individuals to quit smoking. Strengthening support systems, stress-management initiatives, and counselling services may help foster healthier, tobacco-free habits among future healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

cigarette smokinghealth professionalslungsmokingstresstobaccoundergraduate medical students

Identifiers

PMID41939550
PMCPMC13043718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.