Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939545›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Retroperitoneal Masses Decoded: A Practical Multidisciplinary Diagnostic and Surgical Strategy Integrating Radiology and Pathology.

Sakshi Jaiswal, Umang K Agrawal, Deepanshu Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sakshi JaiswalGeneral Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Varanasi, IND.
Umang K AgrawalGeneral Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Varanasi, IND.
Deepanshu SinghPathology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroperitoneal masses comprise a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant entities originating from mesenchymal, lymphoid, neurogenic, germ cell, and metastatic tissues. Because of the large potential space of the retroperitoneum, tumors frequently attain significant size before detection and therefore present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Management varies widely depending on tumor biology; consequently, inappropriate surgical intervention may lead to major morbidity without therapeutic benefit. This narrative review provides a clinically oriented diagnostic and management framework integrating radiologic assessment, biopsy strategy, operative planning, and pathological interpretation. Retroperitoneal sarcomas require complete macroscopic resection, whereas lymphoma and germ cell tumors are primarily treated medically. Multidisciplinary coordination between surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists is therefore essential to avoid mismanagement and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

biopsy strategyimmunohistochemistryleiomyosarcomaliposarcomalymphomaretroperitoneal massretroperitoneal sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID41939545
PMCPMC13050180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.