Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939536›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Varied Presentation of Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: A Rural Case Series.

David Vu, Renata Pajtak, Paul Strauss

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David VuGeneral Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Renata PajtakGeneral Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, AUS.
Paul StraussGeneral Surgery, Central Gippsland Health, Sale, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease. Failure to promptly recognize AMNs can lead to rupture, peritoneal seeding, and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). We present five cases in rural Australia in whom AMN was suspected or identified preoperatively, intraoperatively, or via histopathology. Three of our cases were males, with an age range of 47-89 years. Intraoperative findings varied from dilated appendices with mucinous content, large well-circumscribed masses, to perforated tumors with peritoneal dissemination and PMP. Surgical interventions included laparoscopic appendicectomies, open appendicectomy via Lanz incision or midline laparotomy, and a diagnostic laparotomy for biopsy of a perforated tumor. One patient required cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and another received palliative chemotherapy. In conclusion, familiarity with AMN treatment is pertinent to their rising incidence - we are the first to explore strategies for management of this rare but important condition in rural Australia.

Indexed as

appendiceal mucinous neoplasmscytoreductive surgeryhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapylow-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasmperitoneal neoplasmspseudomyxoma peritonei

Identifiers

PMID41939536
PMCPMC13043724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.