Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939513›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2025

Profiling and Mapping Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Research Frameworks: Protocol for a Scoping Review to Guide Integration.

Siobhán E McCarthy, Jill Poots, John McCaffrey, Emily O'Dowd, Anna V Chatzi, Killian Walsh, Jennifer A Pallin, Clíodhna McGowan, Tommy Kyaw Tun, John Brennan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siobhán E McCarthyGraduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-2409
Jill PootsCentre for Innovative Human Systems, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1575-6121
John McCaffreySchool of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-153X
Emily O'DowdDepartment of Surgical Affairs, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5459
Anna V ChatziSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-577X
Killian WalshRCSI Library, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Jennifer A PallinSchool of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1434-6152
Clíodhna McGowanSchool of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-3844
Tommy Kyaw TunSchool of Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
John BrennanRoyal College of Physicians of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8395-6204
Samuel CromieCentre for Innovative Human Systems, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-0435
Edward W GreggSchool of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core remit of the Evidence Based QUality Improvement and Patient Safety (EQUIPS) Research Network (2024-2029) is to inform research priorities for the Irish healthcare system. Previously, research prioritisation exercises have treated quality improvement (QI) and patient safety research as separate fields. Given the growth of QI research, an integrated approach is required to generate a full view of the continuum of knowledge generation and translation activities in quality and safety contexts. The co-creation of a Conceptual Framework for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Research among researchers, knowledge users and patient groups is required to outline important topics, research questions and methodologies, applicable to all areas of healthcare. A scoping review of the literature is first needed to examine existing QI and patient safety research frameworks to inform the development of a harmonised conceptual framework for the Irish context. Methods The scoping review will follow JBI guidelines for developing and co-creating scoping review protocols with knowledge users. The completed review will be reported according to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews, and Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 (GRIPP2) checklist which supports enhanced reporting of patient and public involvement in research. We will search the following databases from 2000-2025 focussing on literature sources from developed countries: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science. We will map included papers using an extraction template developed to fulfil the study aims. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, and discrepancies will be addressed by consensus using a third reviewer. Dissemination Findings will be used to inform the development of a meta-framework that will be used to guide QI and patient safety research priority setting, measurement and monitoring, implementation, and knowledge translation activities in Ireland, at local and national levels. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FGWUA.

Indexed as

co-designconceptual frameworkpatient safetyquality improvementresearch prioritiesscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41939513
PMCPMC13044539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.