ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2026
Developing a shared pedagogical statement for a university psychology teaching department: is it possible?
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC) requires higher education providers to have a pedagogical statement that describes their collective approach to curriculum design and delivery. The current study describes the process taken by one regional Australian university when attempting to develop such a statement. Method: A multi-stage, embedded mixed-methods approach, incorporating student feedback, staff reflexivity, and dialogic methods were used. Participants' accounts of their personal pedagogy and practices were expected to inform the development of a coherent pedagogical statement, through an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Results: Despite participants' professional experience and content expertise, we were unable to develop a traditional pedagogical statement due to their limited awareness of the theoretical framework/s that inform their practice. Instead, we developed a values-based teaching statement that described what the team considered professionally important. Participation in the project was reported to improve confidence in discussing and conceptualising pedagogy among staff. Conclusion: Values underpin teacher philosophies and practices and may encourage further reflection, exploration, and communication of relevant pedagogical concepts, including teacher philosophies and practices. Findings from the current research have important implications for the development of pedagogical culture locally, as well as for accrediting bodies, universities, and individual educators more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.