ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2026
Predictors of a Depression Indicator in a Large Public Dataset: Logistic Regression and Neural Network Comparison.
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression ranks among the five leading disability causes. The research associations with depression include many demographic, lifestyle and health-related measures. These factors and depression probably interact with each other. Objectives: The objectives of the study are to describe the characteristics of the participants, to examine the bivariate association between a proxy of depression and the study variables, to identify independent predictors with the help of a logistic regression model, and to evaluate a neural network classification model. Methods: A cross-sectional secondary analysis of a publicly available dataset N = 50000 was conducted. Depression indicator (Yes/No) is outcome variable. A neural network of the multilayer perceptron type (15 inputs, a hidden layer with. Results: Depression indicator in 40.7% of participants. In bivariable analyses, physical activity, alcohol consumption, dietary habits, family history of depression, and chronic medical conditions showed statistically significant but small differences. Income (p = 0.239) and number of children (p = 0.078) did not differ between groups. Conclusion: There was a modest association with depression index and poor discrimination by neural networks. In performing a classification relating to depression using machine learning one must use assessments with validated outcomes and employ class-sensitive performance assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.