Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939488›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Assessing the effects of fluids and antibiotics in an acute murine model of sepsis: study protocol for the National Preclinical Sepsis Platform-01 (NPSP-01) Study.

Forough Jahandideh, Asher A Mendelson, Patricia C Liaw, Sean E Gill, Stephane Bourque, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Gediminas Cepinskas, Kimberly F Macala, Janet Sunohara-Neilson, Doreen Engelberts and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Forough JahandidehBlueprint Translational Research Group, Acute Care Research and Methods and Implementation Research Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Asher A MendelsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Critical Care, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Patricia C LiawDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sean E GillDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stephane BourqueDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alison E Fox-RobichaudDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9912-3606
Gediminas CepinskasCentre for Critical Illness Research, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Kimberly F MacalaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Janet Sunohara-NeilsonAnimal care services, Office of Research, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Doreen EngelbertsBlueprint Translational Research Group, Acute Care Research and Methods and Implementation Research Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
David SontagDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Critical Care, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Dhruva J DwivediDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ian-Ling YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Onon BatnyamCentre for Critical Illness Research, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Kashimbi MbutaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dean A FergussonBlueprint Translational Research Group, Acute Care Research and Methods and Implementation Research Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Monica TaljaardMethods and Implementation Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-8961
Braedon McDonaldDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Manoj M LaluBlueprint Translational Research Group, Acute Care Research and Methods and Implementation Research Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0322-382X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in critical care. Despite extensive preclinical research on sepsis pathophysiology, the development of effective therapies has been largely unsuccessful. Key obstacles include limited construct validity of animal models, insufficient methodological rigor and the lack of collaborative frameworks akin to clinical trials. These issues plague not only sepsis research, but preclinical research in general. The National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP), an interdisciplinary network under Sepsis Canada, addresses these challenges in sepsis research through multilaboratory, randomized, controlled preclinical studies. NPSP-01 will establish baseline conditions for future investigations using an acute fecal-induced peritonitis model of sepsis. Methods: This randomized, controlled study will evaluate the effect of standard sepsis therapy in a mouse model of sepsis across six centres. Interlaboratory variability and the interaction of biological sex on outcomes will also be examined. C57BL/6 mice of both sexes will be randomized into sham (healthy control) + treatment, sepsis, or sepsis + treatment groups. Sepsis will be induced via intraperitoneal injection of fecal slurry, while sham mice will receive vehicle control. Antibiotics and fluids will be administered to treatment groups at 4 hours post-induction, and mice with be humanely killed at 8 hours post-induction. The primary outcome is plasma interleukin-6 levels. Secondary outcomes include biological (blood gas and chemistry, white blood cell count, bacterial load), clinical (body weight, core temperature, sepsis score, mortality as measured by surrogate humane endpoints), and feasibility measures. Conclusions: NPSP-01 will be the first multilaboratory study of sepsis and represents a shift in preclinical critical illness research, mirroring the rigor of clinical multicenter trials. By addressing procedural standardization, interlaboratory variability, and sex-based differences, this study aims to enhance the reliability and translational relevance of preclinical findings. The outcomes of NPSP-01 will establish foundational data for future investigations and provide a roadmap for rigorous collaborative preclinical studies to accelerate the evaluation of novel sepsis therapies. Registration: PreclinicalTrials.eu PCTE0000552Protocol Version 1.0, October 21, 2024.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFluid TherapySepsisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute SepsisAntibiotic therapyFeasibilityFluid resuscitationInter-laboratory variabilityMulticenter studyNational Preclinical Sepsis Platform

Identifiers

PMID41939488
PMCPMC13049416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.