ReviewACS omega2026
A Review of Source-Term Estimation for Continuous Methane Monitoring: From Data Acquisition to Modeling and Estimation.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Assessment of the Earthview BluBird Continuous Emission Monitoring System for Oil and Gas Facility Emissions Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately quantifying methane emissions in the oil and gas industries is essential for meeting global climate targets. Combining fixed continuous monitoring systems with source-term estimation (STE) offers a promising pathway. This article provides a systematic review of the technical framework, comprising two core steps: data collection and inverse modeling, with the aim of identifying key technological bottlenecks and outlining directions for future development. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) There is a fundamental misalignment between prevailing sensor-deployment strategies and the ultimate inversion objective. Current optimization criteria primarily seek to maximize detection probability while neglecting their direct coupling with the minimization of uncertainty in the inferred parameters, which constitutes a central bottleneck limiting overall system accuracy. (2) Model and algorithm selection involves pronounced trade-offs and interdependencies. The study identifies an inherent contradiction between the high fidelity and computational efficiency of dispersion models, which directly constrains the choice of estimation algorithms. Moreover, Bayesian approaches offer clear advantages over deterministic optimization when confronting ill-conditioned inverse problems arising from sparse data because they accommodate prior information and enable uncertainty quantification. On the basis of these findings, future research should focus on developing sensor-deployment theory oriented toward inversion accuracy, building high-fidelity surrogate models that balance accuracy and efficiency, and advancing probabilistic inversion methods for multisource, sparse data. These recommendations are intended to guide the large-scale implementation of fixed continuous monitoring systems in the oil and gas sector and to accelerate technological innovation and practice in the green, low-carbon transition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.