Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939318›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Data-Driven Evaluation for Multicriteria Selection of Covalent Organic Frameworks for Membrane-Based Hydrogen Separation.

Kris Helten, Nicholaus Prasetya, Bradley Paul Ladewig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kris HeltenPaul Wurth Chair, Department of Engineering, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Belval Campus, 2, place de l'Université, Esch-sur-Alzette L-4365, Luxembourg.
Nicholaus PrasetyaPaul Wurth Chair, Department of Engineering, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Belval Campus, 2, place de l'Université, Esch-sur-Alzette L-4365, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3794-0613
Bradley Paul LadewigPaul Wurth Chair, Department of Engineering, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Belval Campus, 2, place de l'Université, Esch-sur-Alzette L-4365, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2135-1913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogen is considered the fuel of the future for the decarbonizing industry and the transport sector. A membrane containing porous materials can be used to extract hydrogen from various gas mixtures. The diversity of porous materials makes it difficult to select a specific material for hydrogen separation. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are becoming increasingly popular for gas separation processes, especially for high-temperature applications. The properties of a COF depend on the configuration of various building blocks. A data-driven evaluation was performed to select the most promising COF features and topologies from the CoRE COF database of 1242 reported COFs based on quantification using a scoring approach. The results of the property-based evaluation model show that 3D COFs have a higher potential on average than 2D COFs. Four different normalized evaluations describe the design with the highest potential. The interdisciplinary quantification approach of the preferred properties enables the selection of a specific topology from 2D or 3D covalent organic frameworks and serves as an indication of further advantageous features for a selective hydrogen separation material.

Identifiers

PMID41939318
PMCPMC13044826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.