Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

The FrEEIA readiness assessment tool: an evidence-informed pro-equity readiness assessment tool adapted in Aotearoa New Zealand for the implementation of health interventions.

Nina Veenstra, Papillon Gustafson, Michelle Lambert, Lisa Kremer, Holly O'Loughlin, Karen Bartholomew, Peter Carswell, Mihi Ratima, Adam Fusheini, Patricia Priest and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nina VeenstraNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Papillon GustafsonNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Michelle LambertNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lisa KremerSchool of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Holly O'LoughlinNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Karen BartholomewPlanning, Fundings and Outcomes, Health New Zealand, New Zealand.
Peter CarswellImpact4Good Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mihi RatimaTaumata Associates Ltd, Hāwera, New Zealand.
Adam FusheiniPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Patricia PriestPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sue CrengleNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Equitable implementation is an important dimension of effective implementation. In Aotearoa New Zealand, many health interventions with the potential to lessen health inequities for Māori fail to do so because of implementation challenges. Equity readiness can ensure organisations are both willing and able to implement or scale up health interventions in a way that doesn't result in further health disparities. Methods: An equity readiness assessment tool, designed to be used by healthcare organisations in conjunction with an equity focussed process framwork (FrEEIA: Framework for Effective and Equitable Implementation in Aotearoa), was developed through a seven stage, mixed methods, iterative process. This tool frames equity readiness as a collective, multi-level construct. Initial stages of its development included interviews with interest holders to explore barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of interventions to improve health equity, a reveiw of existing equity assessment and change readiness tools, and a researcher workshop to develop key domains. This was followed by the actual development/adaptation of a suitable tool with advice from interest holders who had utilised similar tools, testing and the development of additional resources that would aid its use. Results and discussion: The final version of the FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is an adapted version of The Readiness Thinking Tool®, comprising 31 statements in three sections (individual readiness, intervention-specific readiness, and organisational readiness) which users rate individually and then discuss as a team, before formulating an action plan to improve equity readiness. Pilot testing highlighted the particular benefit of the tool in increasing awareness of the different dimensions of equity readiness, with the identification of strategies to address barriers to readiness more challenging due primarily to timing, team make up, and facilitation challenges. A range of supporting resources -a User Guide, Facilitator's Guide and Action Plan template- were developed to facilitate action plan development.The FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is now available for use and adaptation through an interactive online interface, a format which was found to carry distinct advantages for tailoring feedback. The research team will continue to make refinements as this tool gets rolled out in a wider variety of service settings.

Indexed as

Aotearoa New Zealandhealth equityimplementation scienceIndigenousMāorireadiness assessment

Identifiers

PMID41939299
PMCPMC13044145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.