ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
ChatGPT-Assisted Image Interpretation for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Differentiating ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) is challenging, particularly for nonexperts. Although artificial-intelligence-based image analysis has advanced endoscopic diagnosis, large language models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require clinical validation. We evaluated the ability of ChatGPT to distinguish UC from CD using colonoscopy (CS) images with and without clinical information. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 386 and 161 patients with UC and CD, respectively, with active disease who underwent CS between April 2001 and May 2025. A representative endoscopic image showing severe activity at the initial flare was selected by a nonspecialist. Data were collected on lesion continuity and perianal disease. ChatGPT was asked to (1) classify UC or CD and (2) estimate UC probability using images alone or images plus clinical information. The IBD specialists performed task (1) under the same conditions. Their diagnostic performance was compared. Results: The median age of the patients was 36.5 and 28 years in the UC and CD groups, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy without clinical information was 75.6% for ChatGPT and 84.9% for specialists, which increased to 87.4% and 88.7% with clinical information, respectively. The odds ratios for correct diagnosis markedly increased when clinical data were used. Receiver operator curve analysis of ChatGPT showed area under the curves of 0.750 without clinical information and 0.948 with clinical information. Conclusion: ChatGPT accurately discriminated between UC and CD, with diagnostic accuracy markedly increased via the integration of clinical information, suggesting applicability in clinical practice despite being less accurate than IBD specialists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.