ArticleBrain & spine2026
Not all cervical masses are ganglions. A case series of 24 patients presenting benign brachial plexus tumors with emphasis on 5 biopsied patients and review of literature.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Benign nerve sheath tumors of the brachial plexus (bBPNST) are rare entities that can mimic more common cervical or axillary pathologies such as lymphadenopathy. Research question: How to avoid an unnecessary and risky biopsy of a bBPNST? Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with bBPNST. We analyzed the clinical presentation, radiological findings, therapeutic management, with a particular focus on a subgroup of 5 patients who underwent a percutaneous biopsy before neurosurgical consultation. Results: The most common presentations were radiating pain and a palpable mass. MRI well showed the supraclavicular (n = 19) or infra-clavicular (n = 5) tumor whose mean largest diameter was 37 mm. 21 patients underwent surgery. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 19 and subtotal resection (STR) in 2. Postoperative outcomes were favorable, although 2 patients developed a new motor deficit. Among the 5 biopsied patients (7 biopsies in total), only one had a history of cancer. Biopsy-related morbidity included severe neuropathic pain in 2 patients and a new motor deficit in 1. All subsequently underwent surgery (1GTR, 1STR). Postoperative outcomes included two cases of transient motor deficit. One of the 2 patients who had undergone 2 biopsies developed a huge fibro-inflammatory reaction, requiring reoperation at postoperative day 7 for suspected hematoma and developed 2 years later tumor recurrence needing reoperation. Discussion and conclusion: Diagnosis of a bBPNST relies on clinical suspicion, careful clinical examination (mass, Tinel's sign), and MRI. Percutaneous biopsy of a suspected bBPNST provides limited diagnostic benefit and may expose patients to iatrogenic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.