ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Continuous Emotion Recognition Using EDA-Graphs: A Graph Signal Processing Approach for Affective Dimension Estimation.
Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion recognition from physiological signals has immense applications in healthcare and human-computer interaction. We developed an electrodermal activity (EDA)-graph signal processing pipeline that produces highly sensitive features for detecting the affective dimensions (arousal and valence) of emotions. Using the Continuously Annotated Signals of Emotion dataset, we compared our graph-based EDA features (EDA-graph) with traditional time- and frequency-domain EDA features and features derived from other signals (heart rate variability, pulse transit time, electromyography, skin temperature, and respiration) for detecting affective dimensions using machine learning regression models. The EDA-graph features showed superior performance in continuous affective dimension recognition compared to the most accurate state-of-the-art models, achieving RMSE values of 0.801 for arousal and 0.714 for valence. Furthermore, we used a variety of traditional and recently published datasets collected in laboratory and ambulatory settings to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the robust generalization capabilities of our approach across different emotional contexts. The models demonstrated exceptional performance in classifying emotional states across the datasets, achieving 98.2% accuracy in detecting positive, negative, and mixed emotions; 92.75% in discriminating between emotions (relaxed, amused, bored, scared, and neutral); and 86.54% in detecting stress vs. no stress. These results highlight the potential of a graph-based analysis of EDA in emotion recognition systems in different contexts, especially for real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.