ArticleJournal of aging research2026
Types of Adversity, Perceived Stressfulness and Resilience in Older Men and Women.
Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Types of Adversity, Perceived Stressfulness and Resilience in Older Men and Women.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated stressful adversities older adults face, examined whether older men and women experience them differently, assessed the stressfulness of these events and studied their relationship to resilience-the ability to overcome adversity. This cross-sectional study included 1179 respondents from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study, born between 1934 and 1944. At a mean age of 75 years, respondents reported the most stressful adversity in the past five years, its perceived stressfulness and resilience using the Hardy-Gill resilience scale. Adversities were coded using a qualitative content analysis. General linear modelling was used to examine the relationship between perceived stressfulness and resilience across types of adversity. We identified ten types of highly stressful adversities, with the five most common being personal illness (23.6%), illness (17.6%) or death (15.8%) of a close relative, relationship adversity (12.7%) and adversity related to living situations (8.6%). 4.8% of participants experienced ageing-related changes as the most stressful adversities. Reported adversities were generally perceived as highly stressful, while resilience scores were intermediate. Men reported more self-related adversity, perceived these as less stressful and showed better coping (a higher mean resilience scale score) than women after a highly stressful adversity. The identified highly stressful adversities included two previously unreported types related to the ageing process: 'having to give up…' (e.g., driving) and 'health/functional decline'. Although the reported adversities were highly stressful, respondents coped well, suggesting a good capacity to manage adversity in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.