ArticleJSES international2026
Optimizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for combined loss of elevation and external rotation: latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer, lateralization, or both?
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large to massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) can lead to combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (CLEER), particularly when accompanied by severe fatty change of the external rotators. In such cases, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) may be insufficient, and adjunctive latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) transfer or lateralization is often considered, though their relative benefits remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 shoulders from 38 patients with combined loss of active elevation and external rotation due to large to massive RCTs and severe fatty change of the infraspinatus and teres minor. All patients underwent rTSA and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on the humeral component design and whether LD/TM transfer was performed: inlay component without muscle transfer (In group), onlay component without muscle transfer (On group), inlay component with muscle transfer (InT group), and onlay component with muscle transfer (OnT group). Lateralization was assessed radiographically by measuring the distance from the glenoid to the humeral component center and the greater tuberosity. Post-operative outcomes were evaluated in terms of active range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Constant-Murley score. Radiographic and clinical results were compared across groups. Each outcome was evaluated relative to its minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Results: The In, On, InT, and OnT groups included 9, 7, 10, and 12 patients, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 38 months (range, 24-61). All groups showed significant improvements in forward elevation, ASES scores, and Constant-Murley scores at 24 months ( Conclusion: LD/TM transfer was associated with restoring external rotation, whereas humeral lateralization seemed related to better post-operative internal rotation. Among the treatment strategies evaluated, rTSA incorporating both LD/TM transfer and humeral lateralization was associated with better outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.