Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41939152›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Power-law Beta Calculations for Realistic Mammography Images from Egs_cbct Simulation.

Déte van Eeden, F C P du Plessis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Déte van EedenDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
F C P du PlessisDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mammography is the most effective method for the early detection of breast cancer. The glandular tissue in a mammogram acts as anatomic noise and limit the detection of suspicious lesions. Previous studies found that that the power-law form can be used to characterize anatomic noise in mammograms with β-exponent values ranging from 1.5 to 4.0. Purpose: The goal is to determine if the egs_cbct simulation code can successfully simulate the mammography images by extracting the β-values from them. This is done using the power spectrum to quantitatively evaluate and compare the β exponent of the egs_cbct images with previously reported values from the clinical data sets. Materials and Methods: The Results: The obtained values correspond to those found in earlier research using authentic mammography images. The mean β-value for the simulated images was 3.42, with a maximum value of 4.41 and a minimum value of 2.36. The simulated ACR phantom was comparable to that of the mammography unit. Conclusions: Based on the β values, the egs_cbct software can successfully replicate mammography images.

Indexed as

Egs_cbctmammographypower spectrum

Identifiers

PMID41939152
PMCPMC13046202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.