ReviewJournal of medical physics
Overview of Deep Learning Algorithms and Optimizers for Brain Tumor Segmentation.
Review in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unified multimodal learning for stroke triage: joint detection, scoring, and segmentation of acute ischemic stroke.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging global context and local precision using a disagreement-based region specific ensemble of Swin UNETR and SegResNet for 3D glioma segmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor segmentation is a vital process in medical imaging, essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of brain tumors. Over the years, segmentation techniques have evolved from manual methods to machine learning approaches and, more recently, to deep learning techniques. The advent of deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks, has revolutionized the field, allowing for end-to-end learning and eliminating the need for manual feature extraction. This review focuses on analyzing different deep learning architectures and explores their performance when optimized using different optimizers. While deep learning techniques have significantly improved segmentation accuracy and robustness, challenges remain, particularly in terms of computational complexity, dataset imbalance, and generalization across diverse clinical settings. Achieved high segmentation accuracy in brain tumor detection, outperforming traditional methods with improved Dice scores, precision, and computational efficiency. Different machine learning and deep learning-based architectures and optimized models yielded superior performance, with Dice scores up to 0.91 and validation accuracy of 98%. Achieved dice scores of 0.84, 0.85, and 0.91 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively, with a mean intersection over union of 0.8665. Future research directions include exploring transfer learning, improving dataset diversity, and developing explainable artificial intelligence techniques to enhance clinical adoption. The insights from this review emphasize the need for further research to overcome existing limitations and expand the applicability of deep learning models in brain tumor segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.