ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Impact of oral contrast use in CT imaging for acute appendicitis on time to surgery: a single-center before-after cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely diagnosis and treatment are critical for reducing complications and mortality in acute appendicitis. The use of oral contrast in computed tomography (CT) imaging remains a standard diagnostic practice in some institutions when acute appendicitis is suspected. Recent evidence, however, suggests that in cases with high clinical suspicion, oral contrast does not improve diagnostic accuracy and may lead to unnecessary delays in care. Methods: This single-center retrospective before-after cohort study included 118 adult patients who underwent appendectomy at a hospital in northern Israel in 2022. In the pre-implementation period, patients underwent CT with intravenous (IV) and oral contrast, whereas in the post-implementation period they underwent CT with IV contrast only, following new hospital guidelines. Data were extracted from electronic medical records, and the primary outcome was the time interval (in minutes) from emergency department (ED) presentation to entry into the operating room (OR). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests. Results: Patients who received IV contrast only had a significantly shorter time from ED admission to OR entry compared to those who received both oral and IV contrast (median: 489 vs 662 minutes; Conclusions: Removing oral contrast from CT protocols for suspected appendicitis shortened time to surgery, with a median reduction of 173 minutes (~2.9 hours). These findings support streamlined imaging workflows and underscore the value of protocol optimization in emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.